| eyescratch on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 05:19:23 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> a review of http://www.zombie-and-mummy.org/ |
Slowly the letters fill in and glow with anticipation. It is
zombie-and-mummy.org that is filtering into existence. Pick a letter,
you may ask? No - pick a story. 8-bit strips enshrined in the highly
modern <iframe> tag - an acquiescence in the new navigator 7 from the
explorer world.
Taking Trotsky at his digital best we may observe:
--->
The fundamental feature of these approchements and similitudes lies
in their completely ignoring the material foundation of the various
currents, that is, their class nature and by that token their
objective historical role. Instead they evaluate and classify
different currents according to some external and secondary
manifestation, most often according to their relation to one or
another abstract principle which for the given classifier has a
special professional value. Thus to the Roman pope Freemasons and
Darwinists, Marxists and anarchists are twins because all of them
sacrilegiously deny the immaculate conception. To Hitler, liberalism
and Marxism are twins because they ignore 'blood and honor". To a
democrat, fascism and Bolshevism are twins because they do not bow
before universal suffrage. And so forth.
<---
Of course this is not a game of zero and one, but of two zeros
guiding us with the digital relativism Trotsky warned us about. We
scroll left, the relativist side glance being upon us till the bitter
end. Most likely the punch-line is missing. Being separate these two
entities never get in each other's way, just their own. Then they
compute in combination, the lifeless quality of their distinction
remaining. With each passing week, the plot sickens to a new cutesy
analogy of errors.
Trotsky continues, uninterrupted:
--->
Undoubtedly the currents grouped above have certain common features.
But the gist of the matter lies in the fact that the evolution of
mankind exhausts itself neither by universal suffrage, not by 'blood
and honor,' nor by the dogma of the immaculate conception. The
historical process signifies primarily the class struggle; moreover,
different classes in the name of different aims may in certain
instances utilize similar means. Essentially it cannot be otherwise.
Armies in combat are always more or less symmetrical; were there
nothing in common in their methods of struggle they could not inflict
blows upon each other.
<---
For the creators it must be a weekly purging of interest that guides
this cross-section of their guise. Yes, the word comedy floats off
into the distance in this lingering bitterness of weekly subroutine.
When, o, when will the times get better? Well, what do those palms
say in this studious grip?
Trotsky, unabated:
--->
If an ignorant peasant or shopkeeper, understanding neither the
origin nor the sense of the struggle between the proletariat and the
bourgeoisie, discovers himself between the two fires, he will
consider both belligerent camps with equal hatred. And who are all
these democratic moralists? Ideologists of intermediary layers who
have fallen, or are in fear of falling between the two fires. The
chief traits of the prophets of this type are alienism to great
historical movements, a hardened conservative mentality, smug
narrowness, and a most primitive political cowardice. More than
anything moralists wish that history should leave them in peace with
their petty books, little magazines, subscribers, common sense, and
moral copy books. But history does not leave them in peace. It cuffs
them now from the left, now from the right. Clearly - revolution and
reaction, Czarism and Bolshevism, communism and fascism, Stalinism
and Trotskyism - are all twins. Whoever doubts this may feel the
symmetrical skull bumps upon both the right and left sides of these
very moralists.
<---
And moralists, they are, these two, risen from the deepest recesses
of everybody else. By their plaintiff action they cursor our
attention to the tides of self-delusion. Then the kitch starts
dropping in. Every Monday.
--
``` <0B@@$ggG%3^`
`C%%G%%3Vg@@$gG00G/%8g8^
:C8888Gg83VC3G0@@@@@@88%80G8GV
(@@$Gg88%CCCGg$BB00@@@@@$8Gg$0B0$@0
X0@@0BBB00ggg8G8$$B0gg08$@@@$8g0000$$C`
($00@BBg000gB0B$0880BB0$$@@@@@@gGggg0B$G
<@@$$$g000000$@$$0000B00$$%$@@@@@g$$0g0$$8
X@@@B$$$$@@@@@@$0B$$BBBB0( ^VGB$B$@@@@$$@(^
G@@$$0B$@@@@@@BBBB@@@@@0B8` `/B@@@@@@@$@G%^%3
<@@@$BB$@@@@@$@@@@@@@@@@$BC X$@@@@@@@@$8g@$
^B@$$$B@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@BC `VgB@@@@@@$@@@^
~@$0$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$0C. </GB$@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@XC` ^8gG@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$@B/(3G0$BGCX` ~8$g88/$@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@3. V8G80@@@08/<` ^(33< g@@0
@@$$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$` <^` ^(<<<^ ^^^~ <VV g@@^
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$8 ^.` (<V@@$((<` ^VCX^@@$.C@0`
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@0` `^~gB%<X@@@/ << /( @V
(@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@0^ ^< ^
%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@V `
.@@@@@@@@@@@@@%`^ >Yes, i like it!
B@@@@@@@@@@0(.^^` ^^
:$@@@$$0$@V< .^^^.. ^</XX$0<(8%
3@@@@3%%^` ^^^`.` ^ :3G@0C/G3
`@@@@@@ ` `^^ `^~<` `.
$@@@@@^ ` `^<<.```^` <VV<<XV^
0@@@@@B`````` ^<^^`^<C@@@@$@@@@@$8:^
/@@@@@@C`~~.`` `~~`.<X0g0BB0GCX/^^^^
<@@@@8`(/<<((^^^.^``^^<XV3G3GC< ~^
`0@$3 <///((((^^^`^~^^<<(/(<^`^^
` `^((<//(/(<<<^ `^^^<</:
` `^<//(((<<//////XXV33/
3X^ `^///XC33333CC3CCVV^`
^:///(/(//^ ^~<(/VC%%%33CV/` ``/X
`<(((((:((((/VVCVVCC//^^<:(((((<^^ V%<^
(((<<<<<<<:::(((((////C3CVVC3X////////((<<::<`
N!C3 S!MULC4ST STR34M!!! --- hTTp://share.dj
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net